". . . Here, [Spearing] not only extends his work [in Textual Subjectivity] to a new series of texts, but grounds it in another 'supergenre,' the medieval French form of first-person poetry known as the dit . . . [literary critics] could find abundant compensation by becoming as accurate and nuanced readers as Spearing. . . ." —Times Literary Supplement
“Spearing analyzes the autographies of a number of medieval authors, ranging from the widely read Chaucer, through the less well-known Hoccleve, to the unjustly obscure Bokenham (the further study of whom Spearing hopes to encourage). This important and carefully reasoned study. . . . should be eagerly read by specialists teaching about the Middle Ages. Highly recommended.” —Choice
“Medieval Autographies engages with writings in the first person in a way that is sensitive towards what we know of medieval textuality and ideas of self, rather than resorting to modern categories such as ‘dramatic monologue’ or ‘stream of consciousness.’ Spearing encourages the reader to appreciate the free and loose structures of the poems discussed, rather than imposing cohesion through analysis.” —Parergon
“Medieval Autographies is a thought-provoking, elegantly written book that challenges us to think about subjectivity as a literary effect available for ‘a [wide] variety of expressive purposes,’ rather than as the expression of a particular narrator’s point of view. . . . Spearing offers an interpretative framework that might fruitfully be applied to many more texts than his book considers and which will stimulate some worthwhile reflection on what we choose to value in them.” —Review of English Studies
“Spearing’s book is engaging and perceptive. Grounded on a careful consideration of the primary texts and a nuanced and capacious reading of his peers’ works, Medieval Autographies adds a convincing argument against the assumption that we can find modern expressions of subjectivity in medieval texts.” —Renaissance and Reformation
“On the heels of Textual Subjectivity . . . A. C. Spearing once more provides the leverage for medievalists to remain relevant. Added to his ‘supergenre,’ the medieval category of ‘autography,’ defined as ‘extended, non-lyrical, fictional writings in and of the first person’ takes up center stage in Medieval Autographies: The “I” of the Text.” —Sixteenth Century Journal
“One of the many strengths of this book is Spearing’s sensitive and careful close readings of the texts themselves. . . . The book is an excellent corrective to certain tendencies in recent medieval scholarship that overstress hidden qualities and psychological complexities in narrators who are either naïve, obtuse, or unreliable. . . . As stimulating as it is engaging, this is a very important book.” —Renaissance Quarterly
“Medieval Autographies does an excellent job of highlighting both the fluidity of the Middle English poetic “I” and the inventiveness of some of its more familiar wielders. . . . At the same time as he illustrates the fruitfulness of his approach to Chaucer, Spearing also reassures his reader that abandoning familiar narrator-based readings of the author’s work need not take all the fun out of explication.” —Studies in the Age of Chaucer
“This book offers an account of an often-noted but less often explained development in later medieval literature: the preponderance of texts written in the first person. . . . Spearing argues that the Middle English interest in the first-person prologue emerges out of the Old French dit.” —Modern Philology
"A deeply challenging and engaging book, Medieval Autographies: The ‘I’ of the Text should be required reading in every graduate course in medieval English literature. In wonderfully nuanced close readings of various late medieval texts, A. C. Spearing extends and further theorizes his earlier groundbreaking work in Textual Subjectivity. His proposal of ‘autography’ as a new way of conceptualizing medieval first-person writing should have profound bearing on how future scholars conceptualize, designate, and discuss ‘character,’ ‘intent,’ and ‘voice.’" —Peter W. Travis, Dartmouth College
