Winner of the 2005 Aldo and Jeanne Scaglione Publication Award for a Manuscript in Italian Literary Studies, Modern Language Association
In Accounting for Dante, Justin Steinberg reexamines Dante’s relation to his contemporary public, an audience that included those poets who responded to Dante’s early work as well as the readers who first copied, preserved, and circulated his poetry. Based on original research of manuscripts and documents, Steinberg’s study reveals in particular the importance of professional, urban classes—namely, merchants and notaries—as cultivators of early Italian poetry.
Although not officially trained as glossators or scribes, these newly educated readers were full participants in an emergent vernacular literature, demonstrating at times a marked degree of sophistication in their choices of which lyric poems to include in their personal anthologies. Adapting their methods of memorializing contracts and keeping accounts to the collecting of medieval Italian poetry, these urban readers and writers made copying Italian poetry a crucial aspect of how they understood and represented themselves as individuals and communities. Steinberg describes how notaries and merchants transcribed Dante’s poetry in nontraditional formats, such as in the archival documents of the Memoriali bolognesi and the register-book Vaticano Latino 3793.
In bringing to light evidence of the urban reception of the early Italian lyric, Justin Steinberg restores the political, social, and historical contexts in which Dante would have understood the poetic debates of his day. He also examines how Dante continuously responded in his literary career—from the Vita Nuova, to the De Vulgari eloquentia, to the Commedia —to the interpretations and misinterpretations of his early lyrics by this municipal audience.
“Combining the most recent advances in Italian philology and codicology with the best imaginative north American criticism, Steinberg turns to the visible residue of readership to give us historical, rather than psychological motivations for the landscape of lyric poetry in Dante’s Italy. Out of the details of physical documents come unexpectedly wide vistas. We are drawn from the margins of the Memoriali bolognesi and the blank spaces of the new ready-made account books to the ‘ineluctable historicity’ of the municipal piazze, and from the interiors of the Vita nuova to the spaces of roomy canzoni and the privileged space of exile which ‘transcends place’ and makes one’s role as poet ‘no longer ancillary to one’s social position but identical to it.’ This is a beautiful, daring, solid, and important book. “ — Alison Cornish, The University of Michigan, author of Reading Dante’s Stars
“ Accounting for Dante is highly original. It explores Dante’s attitudes to vernacular lyric poetry in the light of contemporary manuscript culture—a perspective that has been largely ignored by Dante studies. Steinberg convincingly demonstrates the degree to which Dante’s judgments on other Italian poets are conditioned by their manuscript transmission. The book is an exhilarating read. Justin Steinberg is not only a sophisticated historian and an incisive literary critic, but he also writes with verve and precision. Accounting for Dante will very soon become a classic of Dante and medieval Italian scholarship.” —Zygmunt G. Baranski, Serena Professor of Italian, University of Cambridge
“This is an important, timely, and highly original book. Dante Studies has been slow to connect Dante as social and political creature to contemporary forms of textual production; Dante’s own accounts of literary tradition, and his place in it, have been taken as gospel. Justin Steinberg, in this pioneering application of material text and palaeographical approaches, resituates Dante in lively milieux of contemporary mercantile and lawyerly practice. The result is a brilliant and refreshing account of Dante as contemporary poet, rather than ageless bard: as a man who remakes poetic tradition, through astute understanding of textual circulation and social prestige, as deliberately as Eliot and Pound.” —David Wallace, Judith Rodin Professor, University of Pennsylvania
“It is clear from the first pages that Justin Steinberg’s book is innovative and groundbreaking. Returning the rightful importance to the cultural circumstances and social context surrounding some of Dante’s most important declarations of poetics, this critical analysis provides new and convincing answers to highly-debated issues. It effectively accounts for Dante’s repeated attempts at directing his readership, not only using well-known self-referential speech acts, but especially through careful manipulation of the instruments and techniques of book production and circulation. . . .” — Renaissance Quarterly
“Justin Steinberg’s excellent new book expands the field of Dante studies with a close examination of Due and Trecento lyric culture, its material expression in manuscript form, and its historic readerships. As such, it is a very welcome contribution not only to Dante studies but also to the interface between book history and early literary studies. Stripping away the accretion of centuries of literary historiography, he re-presents Dante within his historical publishing context, showing how Dante responds to and attempts to direct the way in which his works circulated and were transmitted in the wider public sphere. . . . Steinberg’s book, like the best studies, remakes the critical landscape in its wake, and should become essential reading for all concerned with textual production in medieval Italy.” — Italian Studies
“By considering Dante primarily in the context of the larger manuscript culture of his time, Steinberg delves deep into the past in order to say something entirely new about Dante and his self-conscious desire to reshape poetic tradition. Such an approach, relying on cutting-edge methods of philology, codicology, and paleography, reveals the degree to which the prevailing manuscript tradition conditioned Dante’s views of fellow poets, and indeed of his own work . . . Recommended.” — Choice
“This volume offers a scholarly feast. It aims ‘to trace a history of duecento lyric poetry that takes into account the localized and socially stratified centers of textual production active in late medieval Italy.’ In fact, it focuses on poetry written in Emilia and Tuscany in the second half of the thirteenth century . . . This book is essential reading for all students of Dante.” — Speculum
“Justin Steinberg’s unusually keen capacity to draw upon historical, paleographical, and sociological realms of literary inquiry introduces to Anglophone audiences these approaches that tend to be more common in scholarship by Italian critics. But it is his readings of lesser-known poets (particularly Monte Andrea and Chiaro Davanzati) that are particularly illuminating and his suggestions concerning the class-conscious motivations behind poetic canon formation that are most suggestive. . . . Steinberg’s scholarship effectively bridges some of the widest gaps between European and American sensibilities in literary analysis.” — The Sixteenth Century Journal
“In his fascinating new book, Accounting for Dante, Justin Steinberg performs a veritable tour de force by bringing poetic and banking practices in late medieval Italy under the microscope for the first time.” — Christianity and Literature
“A rich and refreshingly innovative study of manuscript culture that sets Dante firmly within a material context. This is an adroitly layered book, with literary criticism and theory set over a solid base of physical examination of the material text. It brings manuscript studies, and, with it, associated political and social contexts, back to a central place in literary criticism.” — Medium Aevum