A Theology of Creation

Both Chesterton and Pope Francis find in the medieval saint an articulation of the cosmic significance of the dramatic encounter of God and human persons. With few exceptions, contemporary Christian thought and art have focused on the human drama without attending to the shape of the created cosmos or to the way in which we are to perceive and praise God through the created world. The Pope’s encyclical calls for, and offers a guide to, a renewal of human life within the whole of the natural order. There is a remarkable affinity between the document and that of the contemporary artist and writer, Makoto Fujimura, whose notion of “culture care” provides for an aesthetic ecology, at once natural and human. Influenced by the thought of Maritain and the painting of Maritain’s friend, Georges Rouault, Fujimura advocates for an ecological art. For him, the link between natural and human ecology is culture. We have already noted the overlap between the title and themes of his book, Culture Care: Reconnecting with Beauty for our Common Life, and the key motifs of LS. Moreover, his own art—a syncretism of east and west, traditional and contemporary, secular and sacred—is a kind of fusion of the art of Rouault with the so-called tradition of abstraction in Rothko.

Fujimura’s work directly addresses the crisis of homo faber. We should note first of all that he places the crisis of art and the artist at the center of the problem of meaninglessness in our time. He sees various forces, including reductionism and hyper-specialization, as depleting the cultural soil. These are features of techno-fideism already familiar to us. He also sees sources of alienation in a laissez-faire economic system and a consumerist approach to art. Moreover, our view of culture war indicates how far removed we are from inhabiting a shared, living culture. As Fujimura observes, “Culture is not a territory to be won but a resource to steward with care. Culture is a garden to be cultivated.” Once again, the language of LS, in this case, the vocabulary of stewardship, is prominent.

The comprehensive vision that informs LS is equally operative here: “Individuals exist in community, in economies and ecologies.” Fujimura repudiates the dualism that infects so much of modern philosophy and is at the root of the anthropocentric ideal: “our multifaceted interaction with our physical and cultural environment directly affects our bodies, our minds, our spirts, and ultimately our souls.” As a basis for thinking about the conditions of a healthy human ecology, he turns to the ingredients of “thriving ecosystems.”